Legal Opinion

Valley National Bank v. Hay

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 5, 1970No. 1 CA-CIV 1161PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

DONOFRIO, Presiding Judge.

In our opinion filed September 8, 1970, 13 Ariz.App. 39, 474 P.2d 46, we stated:

“Although generally American courts construe recording laws as requiring and authorizing the recording of equitable as well as legal interests, 45 Am.Jur. Records and Recording Laws § 49 (1943), Arizona appears to have confined the operation of A.R.S. § 33-412 to legal interests in land. Luke v. Smith, 13 Ariz. 155, 108 P. 494 (1910) ; Jarvis v. Chanslor & Lyon Co., 20 Ariz. 134, 177 P. 27 (1919). * * *”

Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing questioning the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Luke v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Jarvis v. Chanslor & Lyon Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Valley National Bank v. HayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ray Korte Chevrolet v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Blalak v. Mid Valley Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. Pauley & McDonald, Inc. v. BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1996
  4. Wheel of Life Foundation, Inc. v. LadwigCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Blalak v. Mid Valley Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API