Legal Opinion

San Francisco Water Co. v. Pattee

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1890No. Nos. 11326, 11823, and 11912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeals of several parties, separately taken from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying the motion of each for a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

— The pleadings and findings in this case are somewhat voluminous, and we do not deem it necessary to recite them with any considerable detail. The case and its facts, briefly stated, are as follows: —

The plaintiff was incorporated in July, 1867, for the purpose of acquiring and supplying water to the inhabants of the city and county of San Francisco. Its bylaws provided for the appointment of a secretary, and very fully defined his duties. Under them, the defendant Pattee was appointed secretary in 1867. There is a dispute as to when he ceased to be such, — he claiming that he resigned in…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coombs v. BarkerMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Fagan v. Stuttgart Normal InstituteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Meridian Oil Co. v. DunhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Pacific Vinegar & Pickle Works v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API