Christian Science Board of Directors of First Church of Christ v. Evans
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1DissentGaribaldi, J.
I dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the name “Christian Science Church” is entitled to no protection under trademark law. I find that there is adequate, substantial, and credible evidence to support the trial court’s finding that “Christian Science Church” is a protectible trademark because *317it is a descriptive term that signifies a church’s affiliation with the Mother Church.1 I would enjoin defendants from using the name “Independent Christian Science Church of Plainfield, New Jersey” because it creates a likelihood that the public will confuse defendants’ church with plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- John H. Harland Company, Cross-Appellant v. Clarke Checks, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Pizzeria Uno Corporation v. James W. Temple, Jr., D/B/A Taco UnoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.