Legal Opinion

(PC) Bozeman v. Santoro

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 10, 2019No. 1:17-cv-01247Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID BOZEMAN, 1:17-cv-01247-DAD-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE 13 vs. DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 14 KELLY SANTORO, et al., OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 15 Defendants. FOURTEEN DAYS 16 17 18 19 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 David Bozeman (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 22 with this civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and Title II of the Americans with 23 Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API