Legal Opinion

Benlian v. Vartabedian

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided October 31, 1977PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herbert A. Posner, J.

This is a motion by a receiver for an order settling his account, fixing his fee, canceling his bond and discharging him. Three out of four of these requests are uncontested and can easily be granted. However, the fixing of a fee poses a problem and is contested by the judgment creditor.

One would imagine, from recent newspaper stories, that to be appointed a receiver is the next best thing to a gift from Santa Claus. By statute, a receiver may receive as a fee for his services up to 5% of the "sums received and disbursed” by him (CPLR 8004, subd [a]).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McHarg v. Commonwealth Finance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Drucker v. DruckerNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Sandelman v. 21 East 63rd Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Benlian v. VartabedianAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API