Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1915PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. This is an action by Roy Fisher, a minor, by Andrew J. Crafton, his guardian ad litem, against the Portland Railway, Light & Power Company, a corporation, and the Portland Water Power & Electric Transmission Company, a corporation. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Respondent moves to dismiss appeal.

1Opinion of the Court 1

* The general question of the liability of the master for injury to servants of independent contractor is discussed in a note in 26 L.R.A. 524. And as to the liability of the master to a servant for failure to provide independent contractor with safe appliance, see note in 1 L.R.A. (N.S.) 283.

As to the measure of damages for death, generally, see note in 17 L.R.A. 71. And for the measure of damages for death in action under Federal Employers' Liability Act, see note in 47 L.R.A. (N.S.) 80.

REPORTER. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Eakin.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Hexamer v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Benjamin v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  4. Bright v. Barnett & Record Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Morgan v. Southern Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of MullinaxOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Nordlund v. Lewis & Clark RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Cranston v. StanfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Harvey v. CorbettOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Crowe v. AlbeeOregon Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API