Legal Opinion

SurgeTech, LLC v. Uber Technologies Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided November 1, 2023No. 1:22-cv-00882Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE SURGETECH, LLC, Plaintiff, V. C.A. No. 22-882-GBW UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC., d/b/a Uber, Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. /d/b/a Uber’s (“Uber” or “Defendant”) motion for judgment on the pleadings, D.I. 64. Defendant argues that Plaintiff SurgeTech, LLC’s (“SurgeTech” or “Plaintiff’) patents are facially invalid under

35 U.S.C. § 101

because each covers patent-ineligible subject matter. The Court considered the parties’ submissions, (D.I. 65, 74, 76) and oral argument (Aug. 29,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
Berkheimer v. Hp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.