Legal Opinion

Rifkin v. Pologeorgis Furs, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 24, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order entered August 27, 1993 modified by granting defendant-appellant United Parcel Service summary judgment limiting its liability to the sum of $100 on the cross claim of defendant-respondent Pologeorgis Furs, Inc.; as modified, order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs to defendant-appellant payable by defendant-respondent.

In the absence of any competent showing that the alleged nondelivery of plaintiffs’ fur coat resulted from any "affirmative wrongdoing” on the part of defendant United Parcel Service (UPS) or its employees, UPS is entitled to the…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. D'Utassy v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Art Masters Associates, Ltd. v. United Parcel ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Marohn v. Burnham Van Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Wagner Fur, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. ABN AMRO VERZEKERINGEN BV v. Geologistics Americas, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API