Legal Opinion

Royal Paper Box Co. v. E. R. Apt Shoe Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 25, 1935PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The plaintiff claims damages for the alleged breach by the defendant of a contract to buy from the plaintiff eight thousand cartons of paper shoe boxes.

On July 29, 1929, an interview took place at the defendant’s place of business between one Green, the plaintiff’s general manager, and E. R. Apt and Arthur Apt representing the defendant. At that interview and as a result of the negotiations which then took place Arthur Apt made out and handed to Green the following “purchase order”:

E. R. APT SHOE COMPANY Purchase order

Manchester, New Hampshire

Date, July 29-29 A N° 7827

To Royal Paper Box Co…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brawley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Thomas v. BarnesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Burgess Sulphite Fibre Co. v. BroomfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  4. Mathieson Alkali Works v. Virginia Banner Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  5. Remick v. SandfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Empire Gas Corporation v. American Bakeries CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Mishara Construction Co. v. Transit-Mixed Concrete Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Gill v. Richmond Co-operative Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Neofotistos v. Harvard Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  5. Illinois ex rel. Hartigan v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API