Legal Opinion

J. E. Petty & Co. v. Dock Contractor Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 10, 1922No. 6736PublishedCited by 6 opinions

At Law. Action by J. E. Petty '& Co., Incorporated, trading as.the Lebanon'Boiler Works, against the Dock Contractor Company, a corporation. On rule to strike off return of service. Rule made absolute.

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

The substantial question raised in this cause is whether the process as invoked and served has brought the defendant into court. The cause has been before us a number of times, and has been argued from what would seem to have been every possible angle. Indeed, the course of the litigation is open to the criticism of an indulgence in nothing more than legal sparring over what are no more than formal procedural rights. None the less, as the defendant is raising a question of right, whatever its rights are found to be must be accorded to it. Notwithstanding the broad…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lemon v. Imperial Window Glass Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rodríguez Figueroa v. El Registrador de la Propiedad de GuayamaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
  2. J. E. Petty & Co. v. Dock Contractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
  3. Boykin v. Hope Production Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1931
  4. Junk v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1938
  5. Brown v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API