Legal Opinion

Gadomski v. Gadomski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.), dated September 7, 1990, as (1) denied that branch of his motion which was to vacate a stipulation of settlement dated November 10, 1988, and (2) awarded the plaintiff counsel fees.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

It is well settled that stipulations of settlement are favored by the courts and are not lightly set aside (see, Wilutis v Wilutis, 184 AD2d 639). Absent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilutis v. WilutisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Schieck v. SchieckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Abrams v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Kourakos v. KourakosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API