Legal Opinion

K O M A, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Tulsa Broadcasting Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 16, 1951No. 4169_1PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Tax Court, approving the determination of the Commissioner that for the years 1943 and 1944 appellant taxpayers were subject to the surtax imposed by Section 102(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. Internal Revenue Code, § 102(a).

Section 102(a) imposes an additional tax upon the net income of a corporation formed or availed of for the purpose of preventing the imposition of the surtax upon its stockholders or the stockholders of any other corporation, through the medium of permitting earnings or profits to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. World Pub. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  2. DeMille v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935
  3. Sauk Inv. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Dixie, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  2. The Smoot Sand & Gravel Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  3. Bremerton Sun Publishing Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
  4. Dixie, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  5. Barrow Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API