Legal Opinion

State v. Kosek

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 6, 1932No. 28,864PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of carnal knowledge and appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

It is urged that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict of conviction.

The complaining witness at the time of the offense was 14 years and eight months old. She was a pnpil in the freshman class at the high school in the city of Glencoe in this state. She testified directly and positively to the commission of the crime and that it was committed in. a public park on the outskirts of said city just before or just after midnight on May 25-26, 1930. It is undisputed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WiebkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. State v. DomishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. State v. WatzekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. VanGuilderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. State v. Van GuilderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API