Legal Opinion
Haywood Williams, Jr. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 9, 1970No. 29851PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal is taken from an order of the district court denying the petition of a federal convict for the writ of habeas corpus. We affirm. 1
Appellant alleges that he has been deprived of 75 days of his accumulated good time without being given a hearing. The district court found from the record that appellant was present at a hearing before the good time forfeiture board, resulting in the board recommending forfeiture of good time. The record reflects that this is correct.
Appellant does not indicate that he has applied to the Director of the Bureau of Prisons for a recommendation to restore…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jesse Coy Kimbrough v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Earl X. Smoake v. J. T. Willingham, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Carnation Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Richard T. Lynch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eddie Montez Ledesma v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Norwood E. Jones and William Scott Winans v. Norman A. Carlson, Director U.S. Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Glen Dale Seawell v. Warden W. H. RauchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976