Legal Opinion

Lott v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 1, 1983No. AM-311Published

1Per curiam

Lott argues that the commission established his presumptive parole release date (PPRD) by using improperly the aggregation method provided in Rule 23-19.02(2)(g), Florida Administrative Code. We find that the commission erred in applying its rules in this case and remand for redetermination of an appropriate PPRD under the rules in effect in May 1981, when Lott’s release date should have been set.

In calculating appellant’s PPRD, the commission aggregated time required for his 1978 convictions of burglary, petit theft and petit larceny (Case No. 78-152) with time required for 1981 convictions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Jordan v. Florida Parole and Probation CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API