Legal Opinion

Cherrington v. Gardner

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1993No. 92-CA-1892Published

1Opinion of the Court

WALTZER, Judge.

This appeal is from a district court judgment sustaining Gardner’s exception of no cause of action, dismissing Cherrington’s rule for past due alimony, denying Gardner’s rule for sanctions and ordering Cher-rington to pay all costs. Cherrington appealed and Gardner answered the appeal. *1281Gardner seeks affirmation of the exception of no cause of action, reversal of the denial of sanctions, damages in the amount of $2,500.00 for frivolous appeal and dismissal of Cherrington’s appeal.

Cherrington seeks to relitigate the final judgments already decided in this court’s two prior…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cherrington v. GardnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API