Legal Opinion · Dissent

Linder v. Nicholson Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 25, 1933No. 13683Published

1DissentJustice Bonham

(dissenting) : I am unable to give my assent to the conclusions reached by the Chief Justice in the main opinion, and I must, in justice to my own convictions, set forth, briefly, the grounds of my dissent.

It must be borne in mind that we are dealing with a demurrer to a complaint and not with the case on its merits. Under the rule, the allegations of the complaint are taken to be true. It is gleaned from the complaint that Dr. W. L. Linder conveyed his property, consisting of real estate situate in the City of Union, S. C., to Nicholson Bank & Trust Company, in trust, to hold and manage and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dumas v. CarrollSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
  2. Huguenin v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  3. Bass v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Crayton v. FowlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  5. Klugh v. Seminole Securities Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API