Legal Opinion

Daniel Lohr v. State of Oregon and Matthew McAlpin, in his official capacity

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 15, 2026No. 6:26-cv-00929Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON DANIEL LOHR, Case No.: 6:26-cv-00929-AN Petitioner, v. OPINION AND ORDER STATE OF OREGON and MATTHEW MCALPIN, in his official capacity, Respondents. Petitioner Daniel Lohr, who is self-represented and thus proceeding pro se,1 filed an emergency petition for temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and writ of habeas corpus. See Pet., ECF 1. For the reasons stated below, petitioner’s request for a TRO is DENIED and the writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED. Petitioner has been charged with misdemeanor violations of Oregon Revised Statutes…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API