Legal Opinion
Antolik v. Saks Inc.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided September 23, 2005No. 4:03-CV-90203PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER ON BENCH TRIAL
PRATT, District Judge.
I. JURISDICTION
A bench trial was held in the above-captioned case August 30, 2005, through August 31, 2005. Class Plaintiffs are seeking to recover benefits under an ERISA plan pursuant to 29 U.S.C § 1132(a)(1)(B). Federal subject matter jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and personal jurisdiction and venue are proper in the Southern District of Iowa. A previous order of this Court (Clerk’s No. 68) held that the October 27, 2000 letter that Defendant distributed to introduce and explain the 2000…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Martin Hansen, Cross-Appellee v. The Continental Insurance Company and Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Joan Lawrence v. Carl L. Westerhaus, Edward A. Shepard and Bobby HannaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Michelle Antolik, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Saks, Incorporated, Doing Business as Younkers, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Michelle Antolik v. Saks IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006