Furtick v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentChief Justice Toal
I respectfully dissent. In my view, the majority’s holding today ignores the legislative intent expressed by the clear and unambiguous language of S.C.Code Ann. §§ 24-13-210 and - 230. Further, I believe the majority discards our Court’s long-standing “hands-off’ approach to judicial supervision of internal prison disciplinary matters which do not amount to a violation of constitutional dimensions. In adopting its position, the majority has interjected our courts into every prison disciplinary matter which may result in an inmate’s lost opportunity to earn sentence-related credits including a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Board of Pardons v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Jerry Montgomery v. Rondle Anderson, Warden, Indiana State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.