Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Nunnally

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 31, 1931No. 21102PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. The first special ground of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission of certain specified evidence, shows that, when the evidence was offered, the only objection urged was that the evidence was “immaterial and irrelevant.” Under repeated rulings’ of the Supreme Court and of this court the objection is too general to be considered.

2. Bach of the three remaining special grounds of the motion for a new trial complains of a specified excerpt from the charge of the court. However, in each ground the only "assignment of error is as follows: “Movants aver the said charge was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. James v. Cooledge & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Thompson v. FainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Miller v. PerkersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Dever v. AkinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  5. Bertody v. IsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. West Lumber Co. v. SchnuckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  2. Holsenbeck v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  3. Waters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Cain v. Dixie Trading CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  5. West Lumber Co. v. SchnuckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API