Legal Opinion

Lozoya v. Sanchez

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2003No. 27,755PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, Justice.

{1} In this negligence action, Plaintiffs appealed to the Court of Appeals from a judgment and verdict of the district court. The Court of Appeals certified the matter to this Court, because the case involves an issue of substantial public interest as to whether unmarried cohabitants may recover against negligent actors for loss of consortium, and we accepted the certification. See NMSA 1978, § 34-5-14(C) (1972); Rule 12-606 NMRA 2003. Plaintiffs also raise several additional points of error on appeal. We affirm as to all issues except the directed verdict as to the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Scott v. RizzoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Torres v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Calkins v. Cox EstatesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hartford Insurance v. ClineNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Heath Ex Rel. Holdyn H. v. La Mariana ApartmentsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Wachocki v. Bernalillo County Sheriff's DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Chavez ex rel. Baca v. Desert Eagle Distributing Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Chavez v. DESERT EAGLE DISTRIBUTING CO.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API