Legal Opinion

Ponder v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 1, 1991No. A91A1153PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Presiding Judge.

After a jury trial, appellant was found guilty of armed robbery. He filed a motion for new trial, raising the issue of the effectiveness of his trial counsel. After conducting a hearing, the trial court denied the motion for new trial and appellant appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentence entered by the trial court on the jury’s guilty verdict. His sole enumeration is that he was not afforded effective assistance of trial counsel.

1. “ ‘In order to prevail on an ineffectiveness claim, a convicted defendant must show (1) “that counsel’s performance was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Solomon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Cobb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. Cruz-PadilloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. In the Interest of F. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Keanum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API