Legal Opinion

Marshall Wexler v. Regents University of California, et al.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 2, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00377Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARSHALL WEXLER, Case No. 25-cv-00377-EMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 9 v. MOTION FOR RECUSAL; AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 10 REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF FOR RECONSIDERATION CALIFORNIA, et al., 11 Defendants. Docket Nos. 64-65 12 13 14 Previously, the Court dismissed with prejudice Mr. Wexler’s federal claims, denied his 15 motion to amend to add new federal claims, and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction 16 over his state law claims. See Docket No. 60 (order). A final judgment was entered on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Allstate Insurance Companies v. Charles HerronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API