Legal Opinion

Gray v. Fuller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 10, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term. Action by F. Stuart Gray against Edward L. Fuller and another. From an interlocutory judgment overruling a demurrer to the complaint, defendant Fuller appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtFollett, J.

This action was begun May 12, 1896, to restrain the individual defendants from further impairing the rights of the *884defendant corporation and of the plaintiff, a shareholder therein. The Greigsville Salt & Mining Company is a corporation organized in 1890, under the laws of the state of Pennsylvania, with a capital stock of $300,000, for the purpose of mining and selling salt in the county of Livingston, N. Y., where all of its property is situated and its business is carried on. The plaintiff owns $50,000 of the capital stock, and the remainder is owned by Edward L. Puller and persons acting…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marie v. . GarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. New York & Northern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Wetmore v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Lorillard v. . ClydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. O'Brien v. . FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pereira v. Centel Corp. (In Re Argo Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. FreedmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  3. Cahall v. LoflandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1920
  4. Gray v. BeldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API