Legal Opinion

People v. Gilland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cross-examination of complainant was proper for the purpose of impeachment (People v Schwartzman, 24 NY2d 241, 245, cert denied 396 US 846; Richardson, Evidence § 491 [Prince 10th ed]; Fisch, Evidence § 486 [2d ed]). Bias, interest, or hostility of a witness is not collateral (see, People v Webster, 139 NY 73), nor is a matter collateral when it is relevant to impeach a witness by showing a motive to lie (see, People v Brown, 26 NY2d 88, 94; People v Crandall, 48 AD2d 946, 947). Here, the issue of an allegedly false prior accusation was relevant (see, People v Hill, 52 AD2d 609, 611; People v…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. SchwartzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. People v. . WebsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. People v. McDowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CullenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. People v. RetzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. People v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API