American Mutual Liability Ins. v. Chaput
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
The endorsement upon which the defendants rely to establish the plaintiff’s obligations with respect to the pending law actions was issued to permit the defendant Chaput to furnish proof of financial responsibility under R. L., c. 122, s. 5, and so to avoid suspension of his license to operate motor vehicles. By this endorsement the plaintiff undertook to afford to Chaput “with respect to the use of any other automobile . . . such insurance as is afforded by the policy . . . with respect to any automobile owned by the named insured,” Anita Savoie. The policy is expressly stated to be a motor…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Phillips v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Salo v. North American Accident InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Terrasi v. PeirceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- State, Ex Rel. Yontz v. WestOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith MacHinery Corp. v. Hesston, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Jernigan v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Newman v. Basin Motor Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Guarantee Insurance v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Sawyer v. BouffordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.