Legal Opinion

Hudgins v. Georgia So. & Fla. Ry. Co.

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided August 3, 1954No. Civ. A. Nos. 1061-1065, 1146PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTLE, District Judge.

These are actions to recover damages for injuries allegedly occasioned by the negligence of the defendant corporation in causing the train upon which plaintiffs were passengers to be brought to a “sudden, violent and unusual stop.” Several interrogatories were propounded by the plaintiffs to the Railway Company under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The defendant then filed objections to interrogatories numbered 3 and 4.

Interrogatory No. 3 is as follows: “Did the train come to a sudden and violent stop, at the time and place referred to in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Hornung v. Eastern Auto. Forwarding Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1951
  3. Landry v. O'Hara Vessels, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
  4. McCord v. Atlantic Coast Line R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  5. Baker v. Yellow Cab Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Southern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1968
  2. BBAM Aircraft Management LP v. Babcock & Brown LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
  3. Lisa Bonk v. Sacramento Media, LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. Schmidt v. Vision Service PlanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. Wells v. DCI Donor Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API