Legal Opinion

Estate of Peck v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided May 7, 1963No. Docket No. 92912Published

Held, that the amount which the administrator of a Connecticut estate allowed and paid to the named executor of a purported will which was denied admission to probate -- representing attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by said named executor in litigation respecting the decedent's testamentary capacity to make such purported will -- is deductible by the estate as an administration expense for Federal estate tax purposes.

1Opinion of the Court

Estate of Helen Dow Peck, Deceased, Joseph H. Donnelly, Administrator, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Estate of Peck v. Commissioner

Docket No. 92912

United States Tax Court

40 T.C. 238; 1963 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 132;

May 7, 1963, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

Held, that the amount which the administrator of a Connecticut estate allowed and paid to the named executor of a purported will which was denied admission to probate -- representing attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by said named executor in litigation respecting the decedent's testamentary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Estate of Peck v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API