Legal Opinion

People v. Lindsay

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 5, 1925No. Docket No. 1274PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered upon a verdict of a jury finding him guilty of embezzlement.

It is contended that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict in several particulars and also that there is a variance between the information and the proof. At the outset let us state that there are numerous conflicts in the evidence and we shall not concern ourselves with these conflicts, but proceed upon the assumption that the jury resolved all conflicts against the defendant.

The information charged that on or about November 24, 1922, and before July 11, 1923,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Carlock v. CagnacciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. People v. VincentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. People v. PrattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. RossiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. HarmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. FowlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API