Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 27, 1939No. 4 Div. 71Published

1Opinion of the Court

■ BROWN, Justice.

On the trial the defendant requested the following written charge: “(2) The court charges the jury that the mere fact that the defendant had sexual intercourse with Frances Hurst does not render the defendant guilty of seduction.” The trial court refused this charge, and its refusal is the sole predicate for the reversal of the judgment of conviction by the Court of Appeals. The ruling of the Court of Appeals is supported by Murphree v. State, 23 Ala. App. 39, 120 So. 305.

The holding in the Murphree case is not approved.

The charge singles out and gives undue prominence to a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brand v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Brooks v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Swint v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Murphree v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API