Legal Opinion
Hesse v. Champ Service Line
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 31, 1999No. W98-1627PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I,YELVERTON, J.
Defendant-relator, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, sought supervisory writs from a district court judgment which denied its motion for summary judgment as to the third-party demand of Investors-Ryan, a Louisiana Partnership. We called this case up for briefing, oral argument, and a full opinion.
| ¡.Plaintiff, Carl Hesse, received an electrical shock while working within the course and scope of his employment with Goodyear on August 18, 1990. The work was being performed on the premises leased by Goodyear from Investors-Ryan. Investors-Ryan was not the original lessor to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Polozola v. Garlock, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Soverign Ins. Co. v. Texas Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Louviere v. ByersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Home Ins. Co. v. National Tea Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- O'NEILL v. ThibodeauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marsh Engineering Inc. v. ParkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- Bank of New York Mellon v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Marsh Engineering, Inc. v. Ernest L. ParkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- The Bank of New York Mellon v. Whitney Blaine Smith, Et Ux.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015