Legal Opinion

rePlanet Holdings, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 4, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00133Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 rePLANET HOLDINGS, INC., Case No. 1:19-cv-00133-NONE-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL 13 v. (ECF NO. 48, 60) 14 FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff rePlanet holdings, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) brings this suit against Defendant Federal 18 Insurance Company (“Defendant”) alleging causes of action under California law for breach of 19 contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and fraud stemming from 20 Defendant’s refusal to pay insurance proceeds on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API