Legal Opinion
State v. Moak
Texas Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1948No. A-1319PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simpson
This controversy grows out of the claim of the State of Texas for taxes against certain real estate in the City of Beaumont which had been bought in by the City at a foreclosure sale following judgment in a suit brought by the City against Sidney T. and Mary E. Hurley for taxes for 1919 through 1937. The State of Texas and Jefferson County had been impleaded in that litigation under Section 2 of Article 7345b, Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St., and the judgment for taxes in that suit ran in favor of the County and State as well- as the City. The property was sold at sheriff’s sale on October 7, 1941.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Childress County v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. LockeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- Mexia Independent School District v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Grant v. EllisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- City of Austin v. Sheppard, ComptrollerTexas Supreme Court · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Goggins v. LeoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- UMLIC VP LLC v. T & M Sales & Environmental Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- Lubbock Independent School Dist. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Smith v. United States National Bank of GalvestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- ABN AMRO Mortgage Group v. TCB Farm & Ranch Land InvestmentsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.