Legal Opinion
Quezada v. Mensch Management Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 29, 2011PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dismissal of the appeal is warranted because Taveras failed to assemble a proper appellate record. Notably, the order being appealed from explicitly referenced Supreme Court’s reliance upon the affirmation of plaintiffs’ counsel to find that Taveras failed to appear for a court-ordered deposition on March 22, 2010. The attorney’s affirmation was a necessary paper upon which the subject “order was founded” and should have been included in the record (CPLR 5526; Rules of App Div, 1st Dept [22 NYCRR] § 600.10; see Lynch v Consolidated Edison, Inc., 82 AD3d 442 [2011]; UBS Sec. LLC v Red Zone…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Henderson-Jones v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- UBS Securities LLC v. Red Zone LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Elias v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Lynch v. Consolidated Edison, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by7 opinions
- Borbon v. PescoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Board of Mgrs. of the Residential Section of the Plaza Condominium v. FranzeseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Board of Mgrs. of the Residential Section of the Plaza Condominium v. FranzeseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Solovey v. Department of Educ. of the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Borbon v. PescoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.