Legal Opinion

Florida Department of Revenue v. Howard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 26, 2003No. 1D02-3762PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

This case requires us to decide whether section 193.016, Florida Statutes, violates the uniform valuation requirement of article VII, section 4 of the Florida Constitution.1 Although the trial court found only a portion of the statute unconstitutional, we conclude that the entire statute is facially unconstitutional.2

Subject to exceptions not relevant in this case, article VII, section 4 requires the legislature to enact a property valuation methodology for purposes of ad valorem taxation, and it directs that this methodology must be uniformly applicable to all types of property. Interlachen…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Interlachen Lakes Estates, Inc. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. Lanier v. OverstreetSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  3. City of Miami v. McGrathSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. Valencia Center, Inc. v. BystromSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. FLA. FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION v. Caribbean Conservation Corp., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Florida Dept. of Revenue v. HowardSupreme Court of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API