Vacu-Maid, Inc. v. Covington
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BACON, Judge.
Did the trial court err in finding it did not have in personam jurisdiction over the nonresident defendant ?
This appeal involves a suit on an open account which was initiated in the trial court by appellant, an Oklahoma corporation, against appellee, who was a resident of the state of North Carolina when the alleged transactions took place. The case was being tried to a jury when at the close of appellant’s evidence the trial judge sustained appellee’s “motion as to jurisdiction” and dismissed the case. Appellant is now appealing that ruling.
The evidence shows appellant…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Harman v. PauleyDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1981
- Chalek v. KleinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Gregory v. GroveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Galbraith & Dickens, Etc. v. Gulf Coast, Etc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.