Legal Opinion

Croman v. Leighton

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 22, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order, entered on or about June 28, 2004, affirmed, with $10 costs.

Civil Court properly granted tenant summary judgment dismissing the owner occupancy holdover proceeding. Once a rent-stabilized tenant establishes that he or she is a senior citizen, the provision allowing a landlord to seek recovery for personal use “shall not apply” unless the landlord offers to provide, and if requested, provides the tenant an equivalent or superior alternative accommodation (see Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] § 2524.4 [a] [2]). Even assuming, without deciding, that the offer of…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MATTER OF McMURRAY v. NEW YORK STATE DIV. OF HOUS. & CMTY. RENEWALNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Blane v. IslesAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1988

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nestor v. BrittCivil Court of the City of New York · 2007
  2. Breyre v. MeyerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API