Legal Opinion

James P. Paul Water Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1983No. 16383-PRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Vice Chief Justice:

The question before the Court is as follows: when may the Arizona Corporation Commission (“Commission”) delete a portion of the area encompassed in a water company’s certificate of convenience and necessity? Though we approve the Court of Appeals’ disposition of this case, we granted review in order to examine and settle the law in this state on this question.

The issue arises in the following context. In 1969 or 1970, the Commission granted a *428certificate of convenience and necessity to plaintiff-appellant James P. Paul Water Company (“Paul”). This certificate gave…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Corporation Commission v. Peoples Freight Line, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Sun Valley Bus Lines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Application of Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Davis v. Corporation CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. ARIZONA CORPORATION COM'N v. Arizona Water Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Elec. Power Co-Op., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Pueblo Del Sol Water Co. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  3. James P. Paul Water Co. v. ARIZ. CORP. COM'NArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. U.S. West Communications, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. U S West Communications, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API