Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Town of Jennings v. Miller

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 19, 1903No. 14,607PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Application by the state, on relation of the town of Jennings, for writs of certiorari and prohibition to E. D. Miller, judge Fifteenth judicial district court.

1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, J.

The town of Jennings sets up that Charles Ray was tried before the mayor’s court for retailing intoxicating liquors; that he pleaded not guilty of violating Ordinance 100 of the town, prohibiting the *705retail of intoxicating liquors, but that he admitted that he sold liquors on the day charged.

In a special plea before the mayor’s court Ray averred that he had not violated any lawful statute of the town of Jennings, and that he could not be convicted on the charge made, because the ordinance under which he was prosecuted had been repealed, for the reasons specially alleged by him.

Ray was found…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Crozier v. RostSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. NicolosiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. City of Shreveport v. RamboSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  3. City of Minden v. HarrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  4. State v. BickhamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  5. Town of Rayville v. MannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API