Henrickson v. Van Winkle
Illinois Supreme Court
Henrickson, who had been sued in the same action with Harry Reinback and Hiram Van Winkle, sued out this writ of error to reform a judgment which had been rendered in the Circuit Court of Morgan county. The state of the record in the Circuit Court, is stated in the opinion of this court.
Read the full summary
Henrickson, who had been sued in the same action with Harry Reinback and Hiram Van Winkle, sued out this writ of error to reform a judgment which had been rendered in the Circuit Court of Morgan county. The state of the record in the Circuit Court, is stated in the opinion of this court. In the Supreme Court, on the return of the process, the defendant in error pleaded, “ that as to any errors assigned in the record and proceedings in this case, touching the rights or responsibilities of Harry Reinback and Hiram Van Winkle, impleaded with the said Edward S. Henrickson, in the court below, the…
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
This was an action of assumpsit commenced by Ransom Van Winkle against Edward S. Henrickson, H. Reinback and Hiram Van Winkle, in the Morgan Circuit Court, to the October term, 1857, on a promissory note. A summons was issued and served on Reinback and Henrickson, and no return as to Van Winkle. At the return term the defendant Henrickson, filed the general issue, on which issue was joined, and by consent the court tried the cause without the intervention of a jury, and found the issue for the plaintiff, and assessed the damages at $251.17. Defendants Reinback and Van Winkle were called and a…
2Cited by6 opinions
- MacDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Richards v. GreeneIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- City of Chicago v. CameronAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
- Beardsley v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Horner v. ZimmermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.