Legal Opinion

Clark-Dietz & Associates-Engineers, Inc. v. Basic Construction Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 21, 1983No. 82-9312PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge.

Finding the defendant in a diversity tort case liable, the district court certified an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (1976) before determining damages. We deny leave to appeal because the district court did not specify the controlling issue of law to be considered and the appellants have riot pointed out any issue or issues appropriate for interlocutory consideration.

The Mayor and City Council of Columbus, Mississippi, and the Columbus Utility Commission (the City), sued Clark-Dietz and Associates-Engineers and Basic Construction Company for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayor of Columbus v. Clark-Dietz & Associates-Engineers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. K-Mart Corp. v. Swann Ltd. Partnership (In Re Swann Ltd. Partnership)District Court, D. Maryland · 1991
  2. In the Matter of Arthur J. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Clark-Dietz And Associates-Engineers, Inc. v. Basic Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. Crestview Capital Master, LLC v. Floyd (In Re Red River Energy, Inc.)District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  5. Julia P. Floyd v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API