Bey v. Szabad

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION ALI ALI BEY PLAINTIFF/COUNTER DEFENDANT v. No. 4:24-cv-183-DPM TRE DAVIS, Patrol Person DEFENDANT v. RICHARD SZABAD DEFENDANT/COUNTER CLAIMANT ORDER 1. | Szabad’s motion to dismiss is denied. First, construing the pro se complaint liberally, Lamar v. Payne, 111 F.4th 902, 907 n.2 (8th Cir. 2024), Bey has stated a false imprisonment claim. Doc. 5, The strength of that claim can be tested by the factual record on a motion for summary judgment or at trial. Second, Bey has not stated an outrage claim, so Szabad’s…