Legal Opinion

United States v. Fernandes

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 26, 2009No. Criminal 06-197 (JDB)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.

Now before the Court are six motions filed by defendant Joseph Fernandes, including a motion to dismiss for violation of defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. 1 For the reasons explained below, the Court will grant defendant’s motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds. Defendant’s remaining motions will therefore be denied as moot.

BACKGROUND

From 1991 to 2004, defendant was an employee of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). His job responsibilities at EPA included reviewing Notifications Forms for new or re-labeled…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. Robert ManningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. BooneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. United States v. MorenoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2014
  3. United States v. HijaziDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2011
  4. United States v. ZaitarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Bowman v. StaffordDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API