Legal Opinion

Martin v. United States Board of Parole

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 4, 1961No. Civ. A. 1872-61PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

These are cross-motions for summary-judgment in an action by a Federal prisoner, whose parole has been revoked, against the United States Board of Parole, to set aside the revocation of his parole.

In opposition to the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and in support of his cross-motion, counsel for the plaintiff urges that the plaintiff was entitled to have counsel assigned to him to represent him at a parole hearing to be held at the Leavenworth Penitentiary. This contention is overruled. It is true that if counsel appears in behalf of a defendant charged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Fleming v. TateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  3. Herbert Glenn v. George J. Reed, Chairman, United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  4. George J. Reed, Chairman, U. S. Board of Parole v. Lloyd D. ButterworthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  5. In Re TateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robert E. Jones v. Hugh F. Rivers, Donald ClemmerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  2. United States Ex Rel. Heacock v. MyersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Robinson v. CoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Gibson v. MarkleyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1962
  5. Young v. ParkerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API