Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Windsor Park Development Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1992No. D-2136PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This Term we held “that ‘legal holiday’, as used in Rule 4, Tex.R.Civ.P., includes a day which the commissioners court in the county in which the case is pending has determined to be a holiday, or on which the clerk’s office for the court in which the case is pending is officially closed.” Miller Brewing Co. v. Villarreal, 829 S.W.2d 770 (Tex.1992). We reached the same conclusion as to the use of “legal holiday” in Rule 5, Tex.R.App.P., in In re V.C., 829 S.W.2d 772 (Tex.1992). The case now before us presents the issue of whether the holding of Miller should also apply to Tex.Civ.PRAc. &…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller Brewing Co. v. VillarrealTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In re V.C.Texas Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Construction Equity, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001
  2. the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston v. Carolyn Callas, Ray Callas and Jamie Callas, Individually and as the Representatives of the Estate of Gerald Callas and for and on Behalf of Any Wrongful Death BeneficiariesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Simmons v. Healthcare Centers of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  4. Alma Rosa Galindo v. Thomas Snoddy, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013
  5. Lowe v. Rivera, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API