Legal Opinion

State v. Howell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1965No. 38901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In Griffin, the Supreme Court of the United States held that “comment” by the trial court and by the prosecutor “on the [defendant’s] failure to testify violated the self-incrimination clause of the Fifth Amendment which we made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth,” even though such comment was authorized by the provisions of the California Constitution.

*12In the instant case, the prosecutor’s brief states:

‘ ‘ The defendant did not testify at the trial. The prosecuting attorney, in closing argument, commented on the defendant’s failure to testify. The court referred to such fact in the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. State v. FieldsOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. State v. O'ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Village of Monroeville v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API