Legal Opinion

People v. Foringer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1999No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from judgments of conviction entered upon pleas of guilty. By failing to move to withdraw the pleas or to vacate the judgments of conviction, he failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the factual allocutions (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665; People v Hill, 254 AD2d 726, lv denied 92 NY2d 1050). Neither case “qualifies] for the narrow, ‘rare case’ exception to the preservation doctrine” (People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726, rearg denied 86 NY2d 839). The sentences are not unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. ToxeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. ForingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API