Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1943No. O-5309APublished

1Opinion of the Court

r . .. . ~). Q. “: . ...:.... 0 OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 0 AUSTIN Hanowbls Oeo. H. Shep,mrd Captrollo OS PubaLa Accounts AUBt lo, ?ox8* Qe8r Sir: 09, 8ddro8B8d to you, bore eeptlon end mm- dered our rdv 0 UJBOEX the f8QtB whloh you t the80 opinlonr 8ro sll lng them hereln. lnlaw oited ebovo dealt vlth lmtiom vhich are edmittsdl~ d instrumeatrlltlee, euch ee the the ‘c;aP Dopllrtaont 8nd the De- orateton, an en&aged ia war vork in furthemnco of their *otivitier, ion8 have ontored into ‘e08t-plUem hmztxuaets with rarlous private aontmatora, uuoh as the Fort Worth Aircraft.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Johnson v. Haines's LesseeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1799

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API