Forrester v. WVTM TV, INC.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Dissent
I dissent. I believe Forrester's submission in opposition to the station's motion for summary judgment presented substantial evidence creating material questions of fact on all the elements of a defamation action against a media defendant by a private-figure plaintiff: (1) publication (2) of a false and defamatory statement (3) concerning the plaintiff (4) in negligent breach of the professional standard of care (5) that resulted in demonstrable injury.
The first element, publication, is not disputed. The majority focuses only on the second element. It holds that the evidence submitted by the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. HeppsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
- People for Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Bobby Berosini Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 1995
- Turner v. DevlinArizona Supreme Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.